E-ISSN: 1305-3612
Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Abdominal Imaging - Original Article
VOLUME: 23 ISSUE: 2
P: 100-105
March 2017

Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Diagn Interv Radiol 2017;23(2):100-105
DOI: 10.5152/dir.2016.15519
Lijuan Shen 1
Liangping Zhou 2
Xiaohang Liu 2
Xiaoqun Yang 3
1. Department of Radiology, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
2. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
3. Department of Pathology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 14.12.2015
Accepted Date: 28.07.2016
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common primary malignant urologic tumor. The Fuhrman grading system is an independent indicator for aggressiveness and prognosis of ccRCC. We aimed to assess the possible diagnostic role of biexponentially and monoexponentially fitted signal attenuation for the Fuhrman grading.

METHODS:

A total of 33 patients with ccRCC underwent multiple b values (0, 20, 50, 100, 150, 250, 400, 600, 800, 1000 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Biexponential parameters (fast ADC [ADCf], slow ADC [ADCs], and fraction of ADCf [f]) and monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient were calculated, and correlated with the Fuhrman grade of ccRCC respectively. The performance of biexponential parameters in differentiating Fuhrman low- and high-grade tumors was assessed and compared with ADC value by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS:

Qualified images and diffusion-weighted parameters were obtained for all patients. The ADCf and f value were positively correlated, whereas ADCs and ADC value were negatively correlated with Fuhrman grade. Significant differences were observed in ADCf (P < 0.001), ADCs (P = 0.005), and f values (P < 0.001) of high- and low-grade ccRCCs. When differentiating Fuhrman low-grade tumors from high-grade, the ADCf revealed an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.959, which was higher than the ADC value (0.789; P = 0.046), while ADCs (0.807) and f (0.833) showed no significant difference from ADC (P = 0.85 for ADCs, P = 0.73 for f).

CONCLUSION:

Biexponential DWI provides additional parameters for ccRCC. ADCf is more accurate compared with the ADC value in characterizing Fuhrman grade of ccRCC.