COVID-19 S: A new proposal for diagnosis and structured reporting of COVID-19 on computed tomography imaging
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Chest Imaging - Original Article
    P: 315-322
    July 2020

    COVID-19 S: A new proposal for diagnosis and structured reporting of COVID-19 on computed tomography imaging

    Diagn Interv Radiol 2020;26(4):315-322
    1. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
    2. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
    3. Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
    4. Department of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
    5. Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 03.05.2020
    Accepted Date: 17.05.2020
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    PURPOSE

    Because of the widespread use of CT in the diagnosis of COVID‑19, indeterminate presentations such as single, few or unilateral lesions amount to a considerable number. We aimed to develop a new classification and structured reporting system on CT imaging (COVID-19 S) that would facilitate the diagnosis of COVID-19 in the most accurate way.

    METHODS

    Our retrospective cohort included 803 patients with a chest CT scan upon suspicion of COVID‑19. The patients’ history, physical examination, CT findings, RT‑PCR, and other laboratory test results were reviewed, and a final diagnosis was made as COVID‑19 or non-COVID‑19. Chest CT scans were classified according to the COVID‑19 S CT diagnosis criteria. Cohen’s kappa analysis was used.

    RESULTS

    Final clinical diagnosis was COVID-19 in 98 patients (12%). According to the COVID-19 S CT diagnosis criteria, the number of patients in the normal, compatible with COVID‑19, indeterminate and alternative diagnosis groups were 581 (72.3%), 97 (12.1%), 16 (2.0%) and 109 (13.6%). When the indeterminate group was combined with the group compatible with COVID‑19, the sensitivity and specificity of COVID-19 S were 99.0% and 87.1%, with 85.8% positive predictive value (PPV) and 99.1% negative predictive value (NPV). When the indeterminate group was combined with the alternative diagnosis group, the sensitivity and specificity of COVID-19 S were 93.9% and 96.0%, with 94.8% PPV and 95.2% NPV.

    CONCLUSION

    COVID-19 S CT classification system may meet the needs of radiologists in distinguishing COVID-19 from pneumonia of other etiologies and help optimize patient management and disease control in this pandemic by the use of structured reporting.

    References

    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House