Feasibility and mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Interventional Radiology - Original Article
    P: 65-71
    January 2021

    Feasibility and mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation

    Diagn Interv Radiol 2021;27(1):65-71
    1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Japan
    2. Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Transplantation, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Japan
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 01.10.2019
    Accepted Date: 28.04.2020
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    PURPOSE

    We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

    METHODS

    Thirty cases (14 males, 16 females; age range, 0.67–65 years) who underwent endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and/or collateral embolization for PVT after LDLT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and procedural data were collected and analyzed regarding the patency of the PVT site at the last follow-up date (PVT-free persistency) using Log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

    RESULTS

    Median follow-up was 120 months. The technical success rate was 80% (n=24). Patency rates at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months were 73%, 59%, 55%, 51%, 51%, 51%, and 51% for primary patency and 80%, 70%, 66%, 66%, 66%, 61%, and 61% for assisted patency after secondary endovascular treatment. PVT-free persistency rates regarding the subgroups were as follows: children under 12 years vs. adults, 50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42); acute vs. nonacute, 76% vs. 46% (P = 0.10); localized vs. extensive, 90% vs. 50% (P = 0.035); transileocolic approach vs. percutaneous-transhepatic approach, 71% vs. 54% (P = 0.39); and thrombolysis-based treatment vs. non-thrombolysis-based treatment, 71% vs. 44% (P = 0.12), respectively. Among technically successful cases, PVT-free persistency rate was 94% for those with hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein vs. 17% for those without hepatopetal flow (P < 0.001). The only major complication occurring was pleural hemorrhage (n=1). Minor complications (i.e., fever) occurred in 18 patients (60%).

    CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, mid- to long-term portal patency following endovascular treatment was approximately 50%–60% in PVT patients after LDLT. PVT site patency over three months after the first endovascular treatment, localized PVT, and hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein were identified as key prognostic factors for mid- to long-term portal patency.

    References

    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House