Radiation dose management in thoracic CT: an international survey
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Chest Imaging - Original Article
P: 201-207
May 2013

Radiation dose management in thoracic CT: an international survey

Diagn Interv Radiol 2013;19(3):201-207
1. C. H. R. U. Lille , Hôpital Calmette, Lille, France
2. Department of Radiology, Clinique Louis Caty Hôpital RHMS, Baudour, Belgium
3. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
4. Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
5. Section of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 18.07.2012
Accepted Date: 05.09.2012
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine current practice patterns of international thoracic radiologists regarding radiation dose management in adult thoracic computed tomography (CT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic questionnaire was sent to 800 members of five thoracic radiology societies in North America, Europe, Asia, and Latin America addressing radiation dose training and education, standard kVp and mAs settings for thoracic CT, dose reduction practices, clinical scenarios, and demographics.

RESULTS

Of the 800 radiologists, 146 responded to our survey. Nearly half (66/146, 45% [95% confidence interval, 37%–53%]) had no formal training in dose reduction, with “self-study of the literature” being the most common form of training (54/146, 37% [29%–45%]). One hundred and seventeen (80% [74%–87%]) had automatic exposure control, and 76 (65% [56%–74%]) used it in all patients. Notably, most respondents (89% [84%–94%]) used a 120 to 125 kVp standard setting, whereas none used 140 kVp. The most common average dose-length-product (DLP) value was 150 to 249 mGy.cm (75/146, 51% [43%–59%]), and 59% (51%–67%) delivered less than 250 mGy.cm in a 70 kg patient. There was a tendency towards higher DLP values with multidetector-row CT. Age, gender, and pregnancy were associated more with dose reduction than weight and clinical indication.

CONCLUSION

Efforts for reducing patient radiation dose are highly prevalent among thoracic radiologists. Areas for improvement include reduction of default tube current settings, reduction of anatomical scan coverage, greater use of automatic exposure control, and eventually, reduction of current reference dose values. Our study emphasizes the need for international guidelines to foster greater conformity in dose reduction by thoracic radiologists.