Secondary interventions following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Interventional Radiology - Original Article
VOLUME: 12 ISSUE: 2
P: 99 - 104
June 2006

Secondary interventions following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Diagn Interv Radiol 2006;12(2):99-104
1. From Peninsula Medical School and Vascular Surgery Unit , Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, UK.
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 24.11.2005
Accepted Date: 02.04.2006
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE

To review the outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, to determine the incidence of adverse events, and to assess the need for secondary radiological/surgical interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 57 consecutive patients entered in a prospective EVAR database were studied. In addition to database interrogation, case notes and radiology records were reviewed. Frequency and outcome of complications were evaluated after stent-graft placement (mean follow up 20 months).

RESULTS

Overall, 24 adverse events were recorded in 57 patients (42%). The events were endoleaks (14/24), stent migrations (3/24), deployment problems (2/24), limb occlusions (2/24), limb kink (1/24), and femoro-femoral crossover occlusions (2/24). Of all the endovascular patients studied, 23% (13/57) required secondary interventions to maintain aneurysm exclusion. The mean time to secondary intervention in this series was 14 months.

CONCLUSION

Over 40% of EVAR procedures were associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes, and more than 20% of the patients required secondary interventions within 5 years of surgery. This high incidence of late secondary intervention is a cause for concern and emphasizes the need for lifelong follow-up.

Keywords:
endoleak • aortouni-iliac • femoro-femoral crossover, aortobi-iliac, endograft