Small-diameter TIPS combined with splenic artery embolization in the management of refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Interventional Radiology - Original Article
    P: 232-237
    March 2021

    Small-diameter TIPS combined with splenic artery embolization in the management of refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients

    Diagn Interv Radiol 2021;27(2):232-237
    1. Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
    2. Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Oregon, USA
    3. Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    4. Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    5. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    6. Liver Center and Division of Gastrointestinal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    7. Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 31.10.2019
    Accepted Date: 06.05.2020
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    PURPOSE

    Maximally decreasing portal pressures with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is associated with improved ascites control but also increased encephalopathy incidence. Since splenic venous flow contributes to portal hypertension, we assessed if combining small-diameter TIPS with splenic artery embolization could improve ascites while minimizing encephalopathy.

    METHODS

    Fifty-five patients underwent TIPS creation for refractory ascites. Subjects underwent creation of 8 mm TIPS followed by proximal splenic artery embolization (group A, n=8), or of 8 mm (group B, n=6) or 10 mm TIPS (group C, n=41) without splenic embolization. Data were retrospectively reviewed.

    RESULTS

    In group A, median portosystemic gradient decreased from 19 mmHg to 9 mmHg after TIPS, and 8 mmHg after subsequent splenic artery embolization. In groups B and C, gradient decreased from 15 mmHg to 8 mmHg and 16 mmHg to 6 mmHg. All patients except for one in group A and two in C had greater than 50% reduction in the number of paracenteses in 3 months. Any postprocedural encephalopathy incidence was 62%, 50%, 83% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Overall, 20% of subjects with 10 mm TIPS required TIPS reduction/closure compared to 7% of subjects with 8 mm TIPS.

    CONCLUSION

    We found that 8 mm diameter TIPS provided similar ascites control compared to 10 mm TIPS regardless of splenic embolization. While more patients with 10 mm TIPS required reduction/closure for severe encephalopathy, the study was underpowered for definitive assessment. Splenic embolization might have the potential to further decrease portosystemic gradient and ascites as an alternative to dilation of TIPS to 10 mm minimizing the risk of encephalopathy, but larger studies are warranted.

    References

    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House