Splenic artery embolization: a single center experience on the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Interventional Radiology - Original Article
P: 49-55
January 2013

Splenic artery embolization: a single center experience on the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes

Diagn Interv Radiol 2013;19(1):49-55
1. Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
2. Department of Radiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
3. Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 30.03.2012
Accepted Date: 31.05.2012
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the safety, ef„cacy, and clinical outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients (male:female, 33:17; mean age, 49 years) who underwent 50 SAEs between 1998 and 2011 were retrospectively studied. The procedure indications included aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm (n=15), gastric variceal hemorrhage (n=15), preoperative reduction of surgical blood loss (n=9), or other (n=11). In total, 22 procedures were elective, and 28 procedures were urgent or emergent. The embolic agents included coils (n=50), gelatin sponges (n=15), and particles (n=4). The measured outcomes were the technical success of the procedure, ef„cacy, side effe cts, and the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates.

RESULTS

All embolizations were technically successful. The procedure ef„cacy was 90%; „ve patients (10%) had a recurrent hemorrhage requiring a secondary intervention. Side effects included hydrothorax (n=26, 52%), thrombocytosis (n=16, 32%), thrombocytopenia (n=13, 26%), and postembolization syndrome (n=11, 22%). Splenic infarcts occurred in 13 patients (26%). The overall and procedure-speci„c 30-day morbidity rates were 38% (19/50) and 14% (splenoportal thrombosis, 3/50; encapsulated bacterial infection, 1/50; splenic abscess, 1/50; femoral hematoma requiring surgery, 1/50; hydrothorax requiring drainage, 1/50). The overall a nd procedurespeci„c 30-day mortality rates were 8% (4/50) and 0%. The multivariate analysis showed that advanced patient age (P = 0.037), postprocedure thrombocytopenia ( P = 0.008), postprocedure hydrothorax (P = 0.009), and the need for a secondary intervention (P = 0.004) predicted the 30-day morbidity, while renal insuf„ciency (P < 0.0001), preprocedure hemodynamic instability (P = 0.044), and preprocedure leu- kocytosis (P < 0.0001) were prognostic factors for the 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

SAE was performed with high technical success and ef„cacy, but the outcomes showed nontrivial morbidity rates. Elderly patients with thrombocytopenia and hydrothorax after SAE, and patients who require secondary interventions, should be monitored for complications.